Intake reality
70 cases/ day
200–500pages per case
End-to-end automation for courts, built with registries and judges.
From the moment a case is filed to the day its judgment is published, our systems read, check, route, and brief, and a named officer decides at every step. Deployed on the court’s own infrastructure.
300,000+case files processed in Karnataka5+courts running our systems83%less rote registry work, measured4.9/5judicial satisfaction, Madras pilot
Humanly Impossible
What 70 cases per day means for a court
Human Constraint
Average reading speed:250 words per minute
≈ 120 minutesof review per case
Time Collapse
The problem is not diligence. It’s scale
Registry Judge Public
Act 1 · Registry
Filing Scrutiny
AI vision scrutinizes (e)filed PDF
AI Records
Docket ToC, cover, metadata
Roster & Cause List
AI classification, indexing, analytics
Act 2 · Judge
Case View
Portable AI aids & judges’ notes
IAs
Processing & paralegals
Final Hearing
SC clerklike briefs & memos
Act 3 · Public
Order Dictation
Humanlike AI steno
Neutral Citation
Journal-style AI headnote
Communications
Publishing & comms
The court, end to end.
Each stage works on its own, and together they carry one record from filing to publication.
- 01
Filing
Lawyers upload anything, in any format. Pre-scrutiny flags defects before they file.
- 02
Scrutiny
Checks for jurisdiction, compliance, and defects. An officer decides every item.
1.5h → <15 min - 03
Registration
Case data flows into the court’s own systems instead of being retyped.
83% less rote work - 04
Cause list
Listed matters are prepared the moment the list is published.
<15 minautomatic - 05
Judge’s brief
Synopses, indexes, and bookmarks ready before the bench sits.
- 06
Orders
Dictation in the courtroom becomes a formatted order.
30× faster - 07
Publication
Headnotes for judgments, in the court’s own reporting style.
Where it runs.
Every deployment started with fieldwork at the registry, before a line of software was written.
From Google Lens to a judge’s dashboard.
Extraction and scrutiny across Bengaluru, Dharwad, and Kalaburagi, with 11 paperless courthalls. In the reference run, officers decided 55/55 checklist items themselves.
300,000+case files processed
83%less rote registry work
<15 mincause list to dashboard
“Every day I know exactly what the lawyer will argue before the case starts because of your AI.”Justice B. M. Shyam Prasad, High Court of Karnataka
Court have saral che: the court, made simple.
A 10-person team spent 100 days on site, trained 350+ court staff, and co-designed 25 integrations with the court’s IT team. 3 benches went live in July 2026.
150+registry staff interviewed
350+court staff trained
4.33 → 7.96output quality in 6 weeks
Filing scrutiny in minutes, not hours.
Automated defect checks for e-filings and headnotes for published judgments, evaluated by the court against manual scrutiny.
1.5h → <15mper filing scrutinized
5.1 vs 4.3defects found per filing, vs. manual
4.9/5judicial satisfaction
“The AI checks were superior in speed and consistency as compared to manual scrutiny.”Hon’ble Mr. Justice Senthilkumar Ramamoorthy, Computer Committee
Paperless, with the record intact.
We worked with the High Court and 4 district courts on how a file keeps its status, checks, and approvals once the paper is gone. On 1 May 2026, the Chief Justice of India declared Sikkim the country’s first paperless state judiciary.
1 + 4High Court and district courts
31+days of fieldwork on site
Built for institutions that cannot stop working while they change.
Bring us one registry workflow. We'll show you what it costs today.
We start with fieldwork at the registry, not a software demo. Tell us which part of the court's work you want to change first.
Don't send confidential client material before we agree a channel and scope.